Cortney N. Cummings

Lieutenant at 101st Precinct Detective Squad since March 2021, active
Service started July 2001, made $217,000 last year, Tax #928136
Black Female

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)

Complaints

9 Allegations
2 Substantiated
4 Complaints
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

November 2021 Complaint
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

January 2011 Complaint
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

June 2010 Complaint
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: White Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

October 2002 Complaint
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

November 2021 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
January 2011 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 46 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
June 2010 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray White Male, 25 Exonerated
additional details
October 2002 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 18 Exonerated
Force: Pepper spray Black Female, 18 Unsubstantiated
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Female, 18 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Black Female, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Weeks, Antoine vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 714964/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, September 3, 2021

Parrish v. City of New York et al
Case # 07CV00440, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY,
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
First Amended Complaint