Michael A. Visintin

Michael A. Visintin

Michael A. Visintin
Badge #14001, White Male
Police Officer at Police Service Area 7 since November 2018
Also served at Police Service Area 8
Service started July 2012, made $156,000 last year, Tax #953536

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (5)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27967
Closed: 5/11/2023
Case: 2022-27161
Closed: 11/4/2022

View Details

Complaints

9 Complaints
27 Allegations
12 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
10 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
6 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202106684, November 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 6 days)
additional details

Complaint #202100026, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202106373, November 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202000129, December 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201909376, October 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201908917, October 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Body Cavity Searches
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201607801, September 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202106684, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 6 days)
additional details
Complaint #202100026, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202106373, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202000129, December 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201909376, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201908917, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Body Cavity Searches Black Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201607801, September 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 21 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27967
Closed: 5/11/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide business card
  2. Violated patrol rules - refused to provide shield number
  3. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  4. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2022-27161
Closed: 11/4/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits.

Knight, Tahje vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 810019/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 29, 2023
Complaint
Description: For years, NYPD officers of the 40th Precinct and Public Service Area unlawfully targeted Plaintiff and attempted to prosecute Plaintiff without probable cause. On, March 12, 2021, plaintiff Tahje Knight was lawfully in the vicinity of East 125th Street in the Bronx when he was unlawfully approached, frisked, arrested and detained by defendant officers James Weck, Eric Dym, Michael Visintin, Jayther Liriano, Michael Kontorovich, Jose Tejada, and Nestor Amarantepolanco. When defendant officers stopped and frisked plaintiff and obtained no contraband, instead of releasing plaintiff, plaintiff was cuffed and detained to search for evidence of a crime. Plaintiff was then falsely charged by defendant officer We...

Perez, Gabriel, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804083/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 14, 2023
Complaint
Description: On January 15, 2021, three Plaintiffs were illegally stopped, seized and searched, battered and assaulted, detained, and arrested, by and/or at the direction of POs Michael Visintin, John Joyce, and John or Jane Doe 1-10 (the names John and Jane Doe are fictitious, as the true names of these officers were unknown at the time of the complaint). The actions included putting metal handcuffs too tightly on Plaintiffs’ arms, which resulted in loss of feeling, redness, and swelling. The officers fabricated false and fictitious evidence and information, which they forwarded to prosecutors. The criminal proceedings were irrefutably terminated in favor of Plaintiffs when all adverse charges were dismissed and sealed on ...

Phillip, Todd vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 818203/2022, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 20, 2022
Complaint
Description: On December 26, 2019, Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle that was stopped by police. Plaintiff and the driver were ordered out of the vehicle and complied. As Plaintiff exited the vehicle, officers grabbed Plaintiff's arms and forcibly placed him in handcuffs. The police then searched the vehicle without probable cause and did not find any evidence of illegal activity. The officers then placed Plaintiff and the driver under arrest for possession of a weapon despite the lack of probable cause. Plaintiff was taken to the precinct and booked. All charges against him were subsequently dismissed.

Knight, Tahje, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 802343/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 15, 2022
Complaint
Description: On November 14, 2020, Plaintiffs gathered for a memorial vigil in front of the St. Mary's Houses in the Bronx to commemorate the birthday of a loved one who passed away. Without warning or cause, a marked police car pulled up and three of the Defendants jumped from the vehicle. Completely unprovoked, the officers ran over and punched Plaintiff Shakespeare, who was a minor at the time, directly in the face, and proceeded to viciously assault him. Then multiple additional officers arrived, and the Individual Defendants began assaulting Plaintiffs without cause or justification. Plaintiffs were then detained and arrested by the Individual Defendants without probable cause and transported to PSA 7. The Individual D...

Creighton, Tyrone vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804708/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 22, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about June 6, 2016, Plaintiff was driving home from the 43 Pct where he had gone to report the vandalism of his vehicle. The police told him he had to return to the location of the vandalism and make the report from that location. Upon departing the precinct and returning home, he was followed and shot by persons in another vehicle. While the plaintiff was driving away from his pursuers, in an attempt to avoid being shot, his vehicle came to a stop, when it mounted/struck the curb. Then, Dependents NYPD officers, including PO Michael Heinz and Rosalind Jaime, who happened to be in the area observed the interaction, in part, between the plaintiff and the persons in the other vehicle. Plaintiff informed the...

Other Documents