Paris F. Giddins

Paris F. Giddins

Paris F. Giddins
Badge #24186, Black Male
Police Officer at 34th Precinct since May 2021
Service started November 2020, made $84,700 last year, Tax #969736

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word (3)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27989
Closed: 11/20/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$50,000   Martinez, Luis vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 SDNY SDNY 23CV10545
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
16 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
5 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202508031, June 2025
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202412127, November 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details

Complaint #202403879, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202305484, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202207605, October 2022
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202107622, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202508031, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202412127, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Other Hispanic Male, 30-34 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details
Complaint #202403879, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details
Complaint #202305484, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202207605, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Female, 15-17 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202107622, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27989
Closed: 11/20/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, training, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $50,000 total settlements.

Lora Mosquete, Richard vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV01591, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 22, 2024, ended April 10, 2026
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about December 6th, 2022, Plaintiff resided in an apartment with several other people. A dispute broke out between the man Plaintiff pays rent to and another older gentleman that resides there. The cops were called and nothing happened. The cops were called again, and when they arrived the placed Plaintiff under arrest. When Plaintiff asked why he was being detained, the individual defendants told him to shut up and placed handcuffs tightly on his wrists. He was then ripped out of his apartment in the cold and denied access to a jacket before being transported to the 34th Precinct. Plaintiff was transported to a hospital after not feeling well and telling Defendants he has recently been recovering from a ...

Martinez, Luis vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV10545, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 13, 2023, ended November 19, 2024
$50,000 Settlement

M., D. an Minor By M/n/g Haynes-Ward, Shaquana vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 152357/2023, Supreme Court - New York, March 14, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about December 14, 2021, Plaintiff Shaquana Haynes called 911 seeking assistance transporting her son, D.M. who suffers from severe mental and developmental health issues to a nearby hospital. D.M., who was thirteen at the time, had left home and did not return for several days. On December 14, he reappeared outside the family apartment, and Haynes called for emergency services, as she was previously advised to do by D.M.’s medical providers. The officers of the 34th precinct, including the Individual Defendants, Defendant Police Officer Paris Giddins, Defendant Police Officer Aaronjames B. Vinculado and Defendant John Does 1–5, were familiar with D.M.’s mental health status, as Haynes had worked with the...