Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $35,000 total settlements.
Shavers, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021816/2019E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 15, 2019
Complaint
Description: On November 4, 2016, police officers Don Johnson, Philip Terpos, Sincerae Tinsley, Ronald Ingoglio, Michael Munroe, Daniel Brady, Andrew Yakubovsky, and John Does 1-10 were involved in false arrest of James Shaver at or near the front of 594 E. 167 St. of Bronx. Terpos, Tinsley, Yakubovsky and Does 1-10 improperly seized, searched, and arrested Shaver despite Shaver not raising any suspicion. The officers present, despite having opportunities to do so, did not prevent such an improper arrest. During the arrest, Shaver did not resist the arrest and was detained for many hours. The officers, despite knowing the innocence of Shaver, continued to prosecute the case and intentionally and knowingly falsified evidence...
Anderson, Javid vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021440/2014E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 3, 2014, ended October 5, 2016
$35,000 Settlement