Dashawn S. Fogah

Badge #26946, Black Male
Police Officer at 115th Precinct since December 2021
Service started July 2021, made $81,800 last year, Tax #971936

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 5/8/2024
Case: 3 Allegations

View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
6 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Unable to Determine

Complaint #202207643, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Immigration Status)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, May 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202207643, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Immigration Status) Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, May 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 5/8/2024
Case Details:
  1. Bias-based policing.
  2. Failed to take police action/render police services.
  3. Wrongfully deactivated their body worn camera.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: No disciplinary action