Antonio J. Gaglione

Antonio J. Gaglione

Antonio J. Gaglione
Badge #2037, White Male
Sergeant at 78th Precinct since November 2023, active
Service started January 2014, made $117,000 last year, Tax #955936

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28047
Closed: 7/18/2023
Case: 2019-21094
Closed: 12/10/2019

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
4 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202200375, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202102142, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202006753, September 2020
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201504828, June 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202200375, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Question Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202102142, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search White Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question White Male, 30-34 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202006753, September 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Female, 18-20 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Female, 18-20 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201504828, June 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 27 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28047
Closed: 7/18/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2019-21094
Closed: 12/10/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Criminal association.
  2. Guilty: Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
  3. Guilty: Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Other Documents