Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Question
Discourtesy: Word
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Question
Discourtesy: Word
Antonio J. Gaglione
Badge #2037,
White Male
Sergeant at Operations Division since November 2025
Also served at
First Amendment Activities,
62nd Precinct,
71st Precinct,
Criminal Intelligence Section,
79th Precinct,
78th Precinct
Service
started January 2014,
made $125,000 last year,
Tax #955936
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2023-28047
Closed: 7/18/2023
Case: 2019-21094
Closed: 12/10/2019
View Details
Complaints
5
Complaints
16
Allegations
3
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
6
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202500168,
January 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
| Complainant: | Puerto Rican Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202200375,
January 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202102142,
March 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
| Complainant: | White Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #202006753,
September 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Gun Pointed |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201504828,
June 2015
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 27 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202500168, January 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Puerto Rican Male | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202200375, January 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Unable to Determine | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Black Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102142, March 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | White Male, 30-34 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | White Male, 30-34 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202006753, September 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Gun Pointed | Black Female, 18-20 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Black Female, 18-20 | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201504828, June 2015 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Black Male, 27 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-28047
Closed: 7/18/2023
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2019-21094
Closed: 12/10/2019
Case Details:
- Guilty: Criminal association.
- Guilty: Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
- Guilty: Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)