Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2023-28528
Closed: 4/1/2024
Case Details:
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Misuse of time.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Consumed alcohol while on-duty.
Penalty: Vacation days (45 days)
Case: 2023-28901
Closed: 10/17/2023
Case Details:
-
Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $255,000 total settlements.
Gell, Elvis, et Al vs Detective Francis Conejo, et al.
Case # 21CV10225,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 17, 2022, ended October 6, 2023
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 6, 2020 NYPD officers entered the home of the 3 plaintiffs in this matter. Two unidentified officers, for no apparent reason, forcefully brought the first plaintiff to the ground and placed him in overly tightened handcuffs, and he kneed him in the back. The officers continued to inflict pain after plaintiff informed them of medical condition and plaintiff's wife, the second plaintiff, implored them to stop. He now requires pain management sessions for his back and knee. His wife, the second plaintiff, was asleep in bed when the unidentified male officers entered her bedroom with guns drawn. The officers handcuffed her tightly to her bed; she informed them that the handcuffs were too tight and the o...
Castro, Rafael vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 11CV07856,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, November 4, 2011, ended October 28, 2014
$230,000 Settlement