Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 6 known lawsuits, $405,000 total settlements.
Jackson, Tyris vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 504142/2026,
Supreme Court - Kings, February 9, 2026
Rodriguez, Guillermo Coronado vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 500788/2025,
Supreme Court - Kings, January 10, 2025
Sheppard, Cvanti vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV01985,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 2, 2024, ended April 22, 2025
$27,500 Settlement
Teague, Tiffany vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 506630/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 12, 2024
Complaint
Description: On December 12, 2022, unnamed NYPD officers unlawfully arrested and tightly handcuffed Plaintiff without probable cause. In November 2022, Plaintiff's son had been badly attacked in the vicinity of his school, and Plaintiff attempted to guard her son from being hit; Defendant officers possessed photos and videos demonstrating that Plaintiff had committed no wrongdoing whatsoever. Plaintiff had visited the 81st Precinct to meet and follow up with detectives about her son's harassment and assault by students at his school.
However, at the 81st Precinct, Plaintiff was directed to remove her hijab despite her explaining multiple times that she is a practicing Muslim and it is forbidden for men outside her family ...
B., A. an Infant By Her Mng Kearney, Hilda vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 509143/2020,
Supreme Court - Kings, June 25, 2020, ended March 10, 2021
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 20, 2019, an infant plaintiff was present in front of a building. The infant plaintiff was assaulted and battered by police officers. Plaintiff was grabbed, tackled to the ground, and then placed in handcuffs. plaintiff was then taken into custody, held, and then released to her grandmother without being charged.
Sigue, Billy, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 503786/2018,
Supreme Court - Kings, February 23, 2018, ended May 26, 2020
$352,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 12, 2017 Plaintiffs were lawfully inside an apartment when unnamed POs and PO Soney Varghese falsely arrested them with excessive force. Plaintiffs' hands were zip-tied unreasonably and excessively tight. POs ignored Plaintiffs' please to loosen the handcuffs over the course of one hour, causing Plaintiffs to sustain injury. Plaintiffs Jacob and Grant sustained further injuries when a PO attempted to remove their zip ties. Plaintiffs were taken to the 81st Precinct, where they were denied their rights, including their Miranda rights, and denied the opportunity to use the restroom prior to being placed in a cell. Plaintiff Sigue urinated himself as a result. An unnamed PO took pictures of each Plaintif...