John J. Joyce

John J. Joyce

John J. Joyce
Badge #358, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since October 2022
Also served at Police Service Area 7
Service started July 2016, made $175,000 last year, Tax #961846

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (3)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27966
Closed: 5/10/2023
Case: 2022-25228
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case: 2022-25351
Closed: 2/25/2023
Case: 2022-26648
Closed: 2/24/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000   Epps, Kevin, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 025292/2020
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
19 Allegations
9 Substantiated
9 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202202749, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202201577, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202106684, November 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 6 days)
additional details

Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003429, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201909376, October 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202202749, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202201577, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 30-34 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202106684, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 6 days)
additional details
Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003429, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201909376, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27966
Closed: 5/10/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2022-25228
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
  2. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-25351
Closed: 2/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully stopped a vehicle.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-26648
Closed: 2/24/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.

Knight, Tahje vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 810019/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 29, 2023
Complaint
Description: For years, NYPD officers of the 40th Precinct and Public Service Area unlawfully targeted Plaintiff and attempted to prosecute Plaintiff without probable cause. On, March 12, 2021, plaintiff Tahje Knight was lawfully in the vicinity of East 125th Street in the Bronx when he was unlawfully approached, frisked, arrested and detained by defendant officers James Weck, Eric Dym, Michael Visintin, Jayther Liriano, Michael Kontorovich, Jose Tejada, and Nestor Amarantepolanco. When defendant officers stopped and frisked plaintiff and obtained no contraband, instead of releasing plaintiff, plaintiff was cuffed and detained to search for evidence of a crime. Plaintiff was then falsely charged by defendant officer We...

Perez, Gabriel, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804083/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 14, 2023
Complaint
Description: On January 15, 2021, three Plaintiffs were illegally stopped, seized and searched, battered and assaulted, detained, and arrested, by and/or at the direction of POs Michael Visintin, John Joyce, and John or Jane Doe 1-10 (the names John and Jane Doe are fictitious, as the true names of these officers were unknown at the time of the complaint). The actions included putting metal handcuffs too tightly on Plaintiffs’ arms, which resulted in loss of feeling, redness, and swelling. The officers fabricated false and fictitious evidence and information, which they forwarded to prosecutors. The criminal proceedings were irrefutably terminated in favor of Plaintiffs when all adverse charges were dismissed and sealed on ...

Epps, Kevin, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025292/2020, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 5, 2020, ended March 11, 2022
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 15, 2019, NYPD Officer John Royce and two additional unidentified POs ("Doe" and "Roe") approach Plaintiffs (Kevin Epps and Sheron Norman) and stopped, searched, attacked and detained Plaintiffs. POs Royce, Doe and Roe stopped Plaintiffs, strip searched them in an unlawful manner, assaulted, battered and handcuffed them in the "most egregious and excessive manner." Plaintiffs were battered in their heads, necks, back, bodies and limbs. Plaintiffs sustained "serious, severe, painful and permanent" bodily injuries as well as emotional distress and severe and significant damager to their standing and reputation in the community. The initial stop, search and seizure of Plaintiffs was performed solely on ...

Other Documents