Francisco Ruiz
Badge #15750,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 122nd Precinct since June 2007
Service
started January 2007,
made $154,000 last year,
Tax #943946
Lawsuit Settlements:
$40,000 Oliva, Christopher vs City of New York, et al., 2012 EDNY EDNY 12CV06290
View Details
$40,000 Oliva, Christopher vs City of New York, et al., 2012 EDNY EDNY 12CV06290
View Details
Complaints
6
Complaints
18
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Complaint Withdrawn
2
Exonerated
7
Unfounded
6
Unsubstantiated
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202404106,
April 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202105753,
September 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Handcuffs too tight |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202102995,
May 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | American Indian Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | American Indian Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | American Indian Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #202002580,
March 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201001594,
January 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 18 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #200900159,
January 2009
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 53 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 53 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 53 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Race |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 53 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #202404106, April 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 25-29 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202105753, September 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Handcuffs too tight | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102995, May 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | American Indian Male, 25-29 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | American Indian Male, 25-29 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | American Indian Male, 25-29 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202002580, March 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201001594, January 2010 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 18 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200900159, January 2009 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Pepper spray | Hispanic Male, 53 | Exonerated |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Male, 53 | Unsubstantiated |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 53 | Exonerated |
| Offensive Language: Race | Hispanic Male, 53 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2010-752
Closed: 5/6/2010
Case Details:
- Guilty: After learning that a civilian employee was involved in a police incident at a location known to the Department, did fail to report the facts to his Commanding Officer, as required.
- Guilty: Failed to conduct all the necessary investigative steps to determine the validity or existence of the order of protection.
- Guilty: Failed to make authorized, relevant entries regarding tasks performed during his tour, in his Department issued memobook.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)
Lawsuits
Oliva, Christopher vs City of New York, et al.Case # 12CV06290, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 28, 2012, ended November 12, 2014
$40,000 Settlement
Other Documents
Staten Island DA Disclosure Letter
references
'Fail to Report Incident or Notify the Department of Involvement in a Police Incident', 'Fail to Report/Notify', 'Fail to Take Police Action', 'Misuse of Computer, Email, or Mobile Digital devices', 'Misuse of Computer, Email, or Mobile Digital devices', 'Omitted Activity Log entries', 'Omitted entries in Department records, forms or reports', 'Misuse of Computer, Email, or Mobile Digital devices'
Staten Island DA Disclosure Letter
references
'Failure to Investigate', 'Omitted entries in Department records, forms or reports'