Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Hatcher, Shaquille, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 710933/2017,
Supreme Court - Queens, November 21, 2017, ended April 23, 2025
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On April 14, 2012, an individual was shot, with Defendant Detectives becoming involved with the investigation. Defendant Detective Hiddessen utilized NYPD procedures and systems to have an I-Card issued for Plaintiff Giles claiming to have probable cause for Plaintiff Giles' arrest based on false, erroneous, and/or misrepresented statements of Plaintiff Giles' involvement in the shooting. Defendant Hiddessen arrested Plaintiff Giles at his home without a warrant on April 15, 2012. On April 15, 2012, an I-Card was submitted for Plaintiff Hatcher. On the same day, Detective Hiddessen provided false, erroneous, and/or misrepresented information to the Queens County District Attorney's Office resulting in the initi...
Ford, Barshawn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 013867/2015,
Supreme Court - Queens, April 2, 2015, ended July 11, 2018
Zero Disposition
Walker, Tasheen vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 703833/2015,
Supreme Court - Queens, January 9, 2013