Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $100,000 total settlements.
Salzberg, Priscilla vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 715308/2022,
Supreme Court - Queens, August 18, 2022, ended August 8, 2024
$100,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 23, 2015, based on facially wrongful, mishandled, misplaced, and expired or probably counterfeit Orders of Protection, Claimant was wrongfully arrested and prosecuted for the charge of two counts of Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree.
The incidents occurred on November 2, and 5, 2015 when plaintiff was walking on street within 100 yards of two claimants for so-called violating of Protection Orders, which lead to plaintiff's false imprisonment. Plaintiff was placed into police custody and transported to the 111th Precinct. Plaintiff was then maliciously prosecuted. Police officer Milton Calix Knew the Order of Protection was expired but produced an Order of Protection without judge's signature i...
Chroscielewski, Mark vs Det. Calix, Milton, et al.
Case # 16CV06640,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 6, 2016
Complaint
Description: The plaintiff was at a movie with his daughter when the daughter's mother showed up despite the fact that she was violating the order of protection the plaintiff had filed against her. The defendant who is the daughter's mother called 911 and stated that the plaintiff had struck her and kicked her even though he had not. The officers believed the plaintiff and left. The defendant who is the daughter's mother called 911 again and claimed the plaintiff had then pushed her. Defendant Officer Calix came and arrested the plaintiff without interviewing the daughter or his two fellow police officers who had just responded to the original complaint. The plaintiff was charged with criminal contempt in the second degree ...