Joseph L. Difrancesca

Joseph L. Difrancesca

Joseph L. Difrancesca
Badge #30603, White Male
Police Officer at 121st Precinct since December 2022
Also served at Field Training Unit
Service started December 2021, made $85,400 last year, Tax #973356

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 OMB PEG Directive Closure
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202400973, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202308317, August 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, February 21, 2025
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202400973, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Female, 25-29 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Female, 25-29 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 25-29 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202308317, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, February 21, 2025
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Cox, David vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 150334/2025, Supreme Court - Richmond, January 28, 2025