Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Gender
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Gender
Maricelys Gonzalez
Badge #6933,
Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 104th Precinct since July 2021
Service
started December 2020,
made $81,900 last year,
Tax #970556
Complaints
5
Complaints
14
Allegations
4
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
3
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Complainant Unavailable
2
OMB PEG Directive Closure
1
SRAD Closure
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
4
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202603823,
March 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 10-14 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202412526,
December 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202403046,
March 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
Complaint #202401668,
February 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
Complaint #202206655,
September 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202603823, March 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 10-14 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202412526, December 2024 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Force: Physical force | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Unable to Determine | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Substantiated (Charges) | |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| Discourtesy: Action | Unfounded | |
| Force: Physical force | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Force: Physical force | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202403046, March 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 25-29 | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202401668, February 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 60-64 | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202206655, September 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.