Joey M. Leao

Badge #13871, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau Citywide Vandals Task Force since November 2023, active
Also served at Transit Bureau District 3
Service started July 2019, made $65,000 last year, Tax #967956

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30445
Closed: 5/15/2024

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Unable to Determine
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208724, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202208649, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202208724, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202208649, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30445
Closed: 5/15/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A