Jamyang Lobsang

Jamyang Lobsang

Jamyang Lobsang
Badge #9535, Asian Male
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since July 2026
Also served at FIFA World Cup
Service started December 2020, made $88,900 last year, Tax #970666

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29799
Closed: 3/14/2024

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
4 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202408374, July 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202206556, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202408374, July 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202206556, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 65-69 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 65-69 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29799
Closed: 3/14/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Harrington, Jennifer Lynn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 26CV02919, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 17, 2026

Woods, Shaquille vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 152036/2022, Supreme Court - New York, March 10, 2022
Complaint
Description: On September 12, 2021, Plaintiff was lawfully present in Brooklyn when the defendants, including JAMYANG LOBSANG and other unknown officers, tased and fractured the plaintiff's ankle without reason or probable cause to do .Defendants did stop, seize, search, assault and commit a battery and grab the person of the Plaintiff without a court authorized arrest or search warrant Thereafter, plaintiff was transported to Mount Sinai hospital where only his taser wounds were addressed due to the defendants claiming his ankle wasn't really hurt. He was then taken to the 28th precinct and after many complains finally transported to Harlem Hospital for the fracture.