Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 7 known lawsuits, $102,501 total settlements.
Gil, Adan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 812875/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, August 24, 2023
Cannella, Tajon vs Detective Lasalle, Julio, et al.
Case # 151531/2018,
Supreme Court - New York, May 24, 2018
Terry, James vs Detective Lasalle, Julio, et al.
Case # 151530/2018,
Supreme Court - New York, May 24, 2018
Greene, Connie vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 156275/2015,
Supreme Court - New York, October 19, 2015
Greene, Connie vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 156274/2015,
Supreme Court - New York, October 19, 2015, ended July 27, 2018
$37,500 Settlement
Pardilla, Emmanuel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV07027,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 27, 2013, ended July 28, 2014
$20,001 Settlement
Complaint,
Stipulation
Description: Defendant Officers had stopped a vehicle and Plaintiff began to video-record what the police were doing. PO Locher and other 32nd pct officers made false statements to other officers about what plaintiff was doing, damaged his video-recording device & his glasses while violently arresting him. PO Locher falsely alleged, through statements made in complaint by PO Green, that plaintiff jumped on his back, wrestled with him and prevented him from carrying out his other duties. Plaintiff charged with OGA, Dis Con, and Inciting to Riot. All charges were dismissed on March 5, 2013.
Hughes, David vs Police Department, Nyc, et al.
Case # 156815/2013,
Supreme Court - New York, July 26, 2013, ended June 26, 2015
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer Locher stopped Plaintiff on the street, arrested him, took him to the 32nd precinct, demanded he sign a false confession, and charged him with for possession of a firearm, which Officer Locher was never able to produce.