Omer A. Latif

Omer A. Latif

Omer A. Latif
Badge #18553, Asian Male
Police Officer at Criminal Intelligence Section since March 2023, active
Also served at 61st Precinct
Service started July 2012, made $127,000 last year, Tax #952966

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-24815
Closed: 5/20/2022

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202105164, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201603899, March 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202105164, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201603899, March 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 44 Unfounded
Force: Physical force White Female, 44 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-24815
Closed: 5/20/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to comply with training.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Instructions


Lawsuits

Ward, Michael vs City of New York
Case # 506548/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, March 23, 2021