Philip L. Giardina

Badge #2006, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Queens South since June 2019
Also served at 113th Precinct
Service started July 2014, made $179,000 last year, Tax #956676

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202308392, August 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 75-79
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202309140, May 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202101617, November 2020
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201808580, October 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202308392, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 75-79 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 75-79 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 75-79 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202309140, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202101617, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other Age 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201808580, October 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 28 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Wright, Hillary, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 150964/2022, Supreme Court - New York, March 22, 2022
Complaint
Description: On September 18, 2020, at approximately 4pm-5pm, one of the Plaintiffs, Ms. Wright was present at a protest near Washington Square Park in Manhattan, at or around LaGuardia Place. Ms. Wright was standing with a group of protesters and was attempting to film about 8-10 members of the NYPD, who were piled on top of one man. At this time, as Plaintiff was attempting to film with her phone out, Defendant, NYPD Police Officer Hillery approached Ms. Wright from behind and restrained her in a bearhug, picked her up, and pulled her into the street. Defendants NYPD members John Does #1-3 then jumped on Ms. Wright, assaulting and arresting her. NYPD members which may have included John Does 1-3 and Hillery placed Ms. Wr...