Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 6 known lawsuits.
Shavers, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021816/2019E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 15, 2019
Hernandez, Pedro vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 033561/2018,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 3, 2018
Summons
H.,p.,p., Inf. By Mng Perez, Jessica vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV06170,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 14, 2018, ended January 3, 2019
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers Brady and Terrell falsely arrested an individual and forced him to sign a statement implicating Plaintiff in a robbery. ADA Slott also helped intimidate the individual to implicate the Plaintiff. Plaintiff was arrested as a result of the identification, brought to the 42nd Precinct, and charged with Robbery in the first and third degree, Grand Larceny in the 4th degree. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated while the charges are pending.
Wilson, Salim vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 026965/2017E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 13, 2017, ended May 26, 2021
Administrative Closing
Complaint
H., P. P. an Infant By M/n/g, Perez Jessica and F/n/g Hernandez, Pedro P. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 028523/2016E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 8, 2017
Velasquez v. City of New York et al
Case # 026966/2017,
Supreme Court - Bronx
Complaint