Daniel J. Mcguinness

Daniel J. Mcguinness

Daniel J. Mcguinness
Badge #5581, White Male, 37
Sergeant at Manhattan Standards and Assessment Unit since August 2023, active
Service started July 2012, made $138,000 last year, Tax #953086

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25869
Closed: 2/23/2023
Case: 2022-25326
Closed: 8/2/2022
Case: 2022-25327
Closed: 8/2/2022

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206678, July 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202105164, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202007888, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202002611, April 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202001637, February 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: White Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201304546, May 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, November 2014
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202206678, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202105164, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202007888, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202002611, April 2020
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202001637, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint White Male, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201304546, May 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search White Male, 35 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, November 2014
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25869
Closed: 2/23/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-25326
Closed: 8/2/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-25327
Closed: 8/2/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #202002788