Octavio A. Carlo

Octavio A. Carlo

Octavio A. Carlo
Badge #10974, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 4 since March 2018
Service started January 2014, made $183,000 last year, Tax #955786

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27820
Closed: 3/25/2023
Case: 2017-17869
Closed: 9/20/2017

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$20,000   X, Ascen A/k/a Bragg, Nisa vs City of New York, 2020 NYCSC NYCSC 155595/2020
$7,500   Johnson, Todd vs City of New York, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 020635/2018E
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
19 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complaint Withdrawn
5 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202403213, March 2024
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202310264, October 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202307760, August 2023
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202305635, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202302772, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202105961, October 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Penalty: Closed Administratively (No penalty reported)
additional details

Complaint #202403213, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202310264, October 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202307760, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Handcuffs too tight Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202305635, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons White Male, 60-64 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 60-64 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202302772, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202105961, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Age 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Penalty: Closed Administratively (No penalty reported)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27820
Closed: 3/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2017-17869
Closed: 9/20/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Was discourteous to New York City police Lieutenant
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (31 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $27,500 total settlements.

X, Ascen A/k/a Bragg, Nisa vs City of New York
Case # 155595/2020, Supreme Court - New York, July 29, 2020, ended December 2, 2021
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 5, 2019, Plaintiff Ascen X was approached by Defendant Officers and stopped, searched, grabbed, handcuffed, assaulted, battered and detained. Defendants did not have an arrest warrant, probable cause, reasonable cause or any legal justification when they approached Plaintiff. Plaintiff was subject to a strip search and claimed to suffer severe, painful and permanent bodily injuries. Plaintiff was then arraigned and remained incarcerated for 24 hours.

Johnson, Todd vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 020635/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 18, 2018, ended January 10, 2019
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 23, 2017, police officers Octavio Carlo (shield no. 10974), John Doe, and John Roe approached, stopped, searched, grabbed, and detained the plaintiff in an aggressive and excessive manner. The plaintiff was incarcerated for over 24 hours.