Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Wilson, Brian Jr. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV00373,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 25, 2016, ended May 24, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint,
Amended Complaint
Description: In January and February 2013, Plaintiff was arrested three times near his home. On the first occasion, Plaintiff was stopped on the street and arrested for disorderly conduct, which the DA declined to prosecute. On the second and third occasions, Mr. Wilson was arrested for possessing a marijuana cigarette. Officers also interfered with Plaintiff's ability to file a claim.
Smith, Michael vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 504041/2015,
Supreme Court - Kings, December 18, 2014, ended November 13, 2015
Zero Disposition
Malik, Abdul vs City of New York
Case # 018941-2014,
Civil Court - New York, July 16, 2014, ended December 12, 2016
Settlement