Christian Rodriguez

Christian Rodriguez

Christian Rodriguez
Badge #6315, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Community Response Team since February 2024, active
Also served at 23rd Precinct
Service started July 2018, made $64,600 last year, Tax #966307

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest

Lawsuit settlements:
$87,501   Toure, Abass vs City of New York, et al., 2020 SDNY SDNY 20CV04310
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202301497, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202207882, October 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202204549, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202207862, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202301497, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202207882, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202204549, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 15-17 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male, 15-17 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202207862, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Age 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Age 15-17 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest Age 15-17 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $87,501 total settlements.

Williamson, Raheim vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 451984/2022, Supreme Court - New York, February 8, 2022

Toure, Abass vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV04310, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 10, 2020, ended October 21, 2021
$87,501 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 4, 2019, plaintiff's brother, who is paralyzed from the waist down and wheelchair-bound, was being roughly and physically searched by defendant P.O. Zalewski and other P.O.s. Upon arriving at the scene of his handcuffed brother, plaintiff asked the P.O.s why they were arresting him. Despite complying with the P.O.s' orders, plaintiff was pushed by defendant P.O. Aiello. Plaintiff attempted to walk away but defendant P.O.s Elliott and Aiello continued to follow and push plaintiff. Defendant P.O. Wang ordered his officers to handcuff plaintiff. Several P.O.s surrounded, physically restrained, and repeatedly punched plaintiff. While plaintiff was on the ground, P.O. Zalewski forcefully stomped on the ba...