Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2019-20657
Closed: 7/29/2019
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
.
-
Guilty:
Failed to make proper notifications (Patrol Supervisor, IAB, Desk Sergeant, sick desk Supervisor, ACS, Commanding Officer if PPO, operations unit, CCRB, etc.).
-
Guilty:
Failed to make proper notifications (Patrol Supervisor, IAB, Desk Sergeant, sick desk Supervisor, ACS, Commanding Officer if PPO, operations unit, CCRB, etc.).
made or caused to be made false or inaccurate entries in Department records.
-
Guilty:
Failed to make required entries in Department logs (command log, roll call, activity log, vehicle movement/utilization, radio log, vehicle assignment, dv activity log).
-
Guilty:
Improperly used Department property/resources/equipment
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)
Case: 2012-6833
Opened: 2/21/2012
Closed: 3/26/2014
Case Details:
-
Dismissed:
While on-duty and while on dismissal probation, having been approached by an individual, known to the Department, requesting a "statement of correction by a Police Officer" from (pb660-120), did prepare and deliver said form to the individual without receiving/viewing acceptable proof of repair or correction
-
Guilty:
While on-duty and while on dismissal probation, did sign, under penalty of law, a " statement of correction by a Police Officer" form affirming that repairs were made to the subject vehicle, without having verified that said repairs or corrections were made
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty (20) vacation days
Fitzpatrick, Dru J. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 152383/2019,
Supreme Court - New York, March 12, 2019, ended April 22, 2021
$52,500 Settlement