Steven M. Mauriello
Service
started July 1989,
made $230,000 last year,
Tax #895117
White Male
Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000 Blount et al v. The City of New York et al, EDNY EDNY 11CV02089
$600,001 Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 10CV06005
View Details
$30,000 Blount et al v. The City of New York et al, EDNY EDNY 11CV02089
$600,001 Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 10CV06005
View Details
Complaints
1
Complaint
2
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Exonerated
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #200802197,
February 2008
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #200802197, February 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 25 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched | Exonerated | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2010-2948
Closed: 7/28/2015
Case Details:
- Guilty: Did fail and neglect to ensure that the proper complaint report
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $630,001 total settlements.Blount et al v. The City of New York et al
Case # 11CV02089, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint, Stipulation
Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Case # 10CV06005, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$600,001 Settlement
Second Amended Complaint
Description: Lawsuit against high ranking NYPD officials to silence, intimidate, threaten and retaliate against plaintiff for his documentation and disclosure of corruption with the NYPD. Specifically, that the NYPD had established an illegal quota policy for the issuance of summonses and arrests and that defendants were falsifying and instructing police officers to suborn perjury on police reports in order to distort COMPSTAT statistics. In order to prevent disclosure of these acts, defendants unlawfully entered plaintiff's home, had him forcibly removed in handcuffs, seized his personal effects, including evidence he had gathered documenting NYPD corruption and had him admitted to Jamaica Hospital Center against his will...