Robert L. Mui

Badge #4242, Asian Male
Sergeant at 66th Precinct since January 2023
Also served at 71st Precinct, 62nd Precinct
Service started January 2014, made $131,000 last year, Tax #956117

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Lawsuit Settlements:
$150,001   Rodney, Patricia vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 SDNY SDNY 22CV01445
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202200517, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201906324, July 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201905146, June 2019
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202200517, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Female, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Chokehold Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Restricted Breathing Female, 55-59 Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201906324, July 2019
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201905146, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender Male, 53 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $150,001 total settlements.

Rodney, Patricia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 22CV01445, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 23, 2022, ended January 15, 2025
$150,001 Settlement
Complaint

Jennings, Sade vs City of New York
Case # 525944/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, December 29, 2020
Complaint
Description: On April 19, 2019, NYPD officer Robert Mui, Kings County District Attorney's Office legal assistant Alberto Oquendo, John or Jane Doe improperly stopped, searched, questioned, arrested, and detained Sade Jennings who was properly near 143 Sterling st. of Brooklyn. Jennings was improperly targeted by the officers based on race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or other improper characteristics. Specifically, Jennings was improperly targeted based on her African American female identity. Jennings was approached by the above personnel for no apparent reason and without reasonable suspicion and questioned her. Mui, Oquendo, and Does then improperly accused Jennings of crimes that she did not commit. Jennings w...

Other Documents

DA Disclosure Letter