Edgardo E. Carrieri

Badge #18255, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Detective Borough Brooklyn North Evidence Collection Team since August 2025
Also served at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Specialized Units, 75th Precinct
Service started July 2007, made $166,000 last year, Tax #944417

Lawsuit Settlements:
$50,000   Devora, Desyree, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 511278/2020
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
3 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200817988, December 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200808005, May 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200817988, December 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 43 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200808005, May 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $50,000 total settlements.

Devora, Desyree, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 511278/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, June 30, 2020, ended August 17, 2022
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On, or about June 6, 2019, in the vicinity of Fountain Avenue and Hegeman Avenue, plaintiffs were seated in the rear seats of a motor vehicle when they were unlawfully stopped by Defendants. Defendants had no legal justification for the the stop. Defendants conducted an unlawful search of the vehicle. defendants then fabricated observations to justify the search and seizure. They restrained and removed plaintiffs by rear-handcuffing them in an excessively tight fashion. Plaintiffs were then removed to the 75th precinct. Plaintiffs were then criminally processed. Defendants sent fabricated evidence to the DA, namely that a guna nd ammunition was recovered. further they supressed exculpatiory evidnce namely wea...

Walston, Kevin Jamel, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV04480, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 14, 2015, ended January 2, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint, Second Amended Complaint
Description: First Incident: Plaintiff 1 was arrested by defendant officers for allegedly permitting his dog to attack someone months prior. He was brought to the 75th Precinct, charged with 120.10; 120.05; 201.25; 120.14; 130.52; 145; 265.01; 120.15; and 240.26, which were all dismissed. Second incident: Plaintiff 1 was approached by officers while outside his building, arrested and brought to the 75th Precinct, and charged with 265.02; 265.01-B, and 265.01, which were dismissed. Third Incident: Defendant officers broke into Plaintiff's home, arrested everyone, brought them to the 75th Precinct. Two Plaintiffs were charged with 140.15; 140.10(A); and 140.05. Charges dismissed. Fourth incident: Defendant Officers were waiti...

Other Documents