Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $175,000 total settlements.
Mason, Dwayne vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 533365/2025,
Supreme Court - Kings, September 25, 2025
Taussi, Eran vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150359/2015,
Supreme Court - Richmond, October 2, 2015, ended July 30, 2019
$175,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 30, 2014 PO Michael Upstick falsely arrested and verbally and physically abused Plaintiff without legal justification. Plaintiff was wrongfully accused of aggravated harassment and maliciously prosecuted until the District Attorney declined to pursue the charge. Plaintiff suffered prolonged, incarceration, serious, harmful, and permanent injuries, great pain, shock, mental anguish, and lost wages as a result of this incident.
Taussi, Eran vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 701822/2015,
Supreme Court - Queens, April 6, 2015, ended May 20, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On January 30, 2014, at around 2:30PM, plaintiff was falsely accused of aggravated harassment. Defendant officer Michael Upstick detained and arrested plaintiff, and committed assault and battery against plaintiff, causing injuries without probable cause or sufficient justification. Plaintiff suffered mental distress while under illegal imprisonment.
Defendant officer knew the that charges were false and were unsupported by the facts, but filed them anyway. The Richmond County District Attorney’s Office declined to prosecute the charges and the matter was dismissed in plaintiff’s favor.
Balima, Ousmane vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 004571/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 31, 2014, ended October 21, 2014
Zero Disposition