Arun R. Prashad

Arun R. Prashad

Arun R. Prashad
Badge #7099, Asian Male
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since March 2021
Service started October 2019, made $121,000 last year, Tax #968717

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Action
Discourtesy: Word
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement

Complaints

5 Complaints
12 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
6 Unfounded

Complaint #202600852, January 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202411738, November 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202406015, June 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)
additional details

Complaint #202301341, February 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202600852, January 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202411738, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202406015, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Female, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Gender Black Female, 50-54 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 50-54 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)
additional details
Complaint #202301341, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Perry, Christopher Jr. & Perry, Christopher vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 162289/2024, Supreme Court - New York, December 30, 2024
Complaint
Description: On June 16, 2024, plaintiffs were lawfully present in the vicinity of Lenox Avenue and West 119th Street, County of New York. POs Ashfaqur Rahman, Sohral Peerzada, Walter Mancilla, Arun Prashad, Matthew Grieve, Damien Weber, and unnamed POs, without probable cause, an arrest warrant, or any legal justification, stopped, seized, searched, and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were then falsely and maliciously prosecuted and required to make numerous court appearances, until all charges against them were terminated favorably. Plaintiffs sustained physical and emotional pain and injuries as a result of this incident.