Jeuri Paulino

Jeuri Paulino

Jeuri Paulino
Badge #11935, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Bronx North Community Response Team since May 2026
Also served at 44th Precinct, Patrol Borough Bronx Community Response Team
Service started January 2013, made $162,000 last year, Tax #954220

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25624
Closed: 2/18/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000   Ames, Yuanna vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 024902/2020E
$40,000   Suares, Olivia vs City of New York, et al., 2020 SDNY SDNY 19CV11327
$5,000   Thomas, Rodney vs City of New York, et al., 2015 BCSC BCSC 023653/2015E
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
12 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202503467, March 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202406953, June 2024
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202402315, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202207304, October 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202003465, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202001992, March 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202503467, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Hit against inanimate object Age 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Age 21-24 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Hit against inanimate object Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202406953, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202402315, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202207304, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202003465, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #202001992, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 55-59 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25624
Closed: 2/18/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully deactivated their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $90,000 total settlements.

Ames, Yuanna vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 024902/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 30, 2020, ended August 8, 2022
$45,000 Settlement

Suares, Olivia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV11327, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 21, 2020, ended September 9, 2022
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 23, 2018, P.O.s including Sergeant Flores, Officers Camiglia, Bupp, Veliz, Rubin, Escoto, Paulio, Burgos, and Lee Rubin, Lieutenant Sharbir, and Detectives Jason Baker, Andre Smith, Diskin, and Hennessy, visited Plaintiff’s residence at approximately 4:30 a.m., and rushed in without consent when the door was opened. Some of the defendants were in uniform, while others were not. The officers asked Plaintiff if any gunshots were heard from her home, and informed Plaintiff that someone had been shot in the apartment located under her apartment’s bedroom. Plaintiff responded she had not heard any gunshots. Officers rushed into Plaintiff’s bedroom without consent, where her daughter’s boyfriend and daughter...

Suares, Olivia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV05832, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 10, 2019, ended September 9, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On March 23, 2018 plaintiff was asleep in her home at 4:30 AM. Police knocked on the door and plaintiff's daughter opened the door. Police barged in explaining someone had been shot the floor below them, although no one had heard any shots. Then NYPD officer Chabert brought plaintiff and her daughter and her daughter's boyfriend in for questioning to the police station. Plaintiff and her daughter were allowed to leave the police station after 2 hours but then the daughter's boyfriend was arrested for shooting a gun causing an injury to someone in the floor below it. Plaintiff was forced to sign a permission to search form before she could enter her apartment - she was forced under duress. Charges were later dro...

Thomas, Rodney vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023653/2015E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 10, 2015, ended July 7, 2016
$5,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about February 16, 2015 at 1:47 a.m., Plaintiff was on the sidewalk in front of a park when Defendants unlawfully detailed, arrested, and imprisoned Plaintiff. Plaintiff had not committed or attempted to commit any illegal act. Defendant POs had no probable cause or other justification to arrest Plaintiff. Plaintiff suffered physical injuries, emotional and psychological distress, anguish, anxiety, fear, humiliation, loss of freedom, loss of wages, legal expenses, and damage to his reputation. The criminal proceeding against Plaintiff was dismissed on March 20, 2015.

Other Documents