Jonathan A. Gaby
Badge #2460,
Black Male
Sergeant at Patrol Borough Queens South Community Response Team since March 2026
Service
started April 2017,
made $185,000 last year,
Tax #963527
Complaints
3
Complaints
5
Allegations
0
Substantiated
2
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Complaint Withdrawn
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202607682,
July 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #202504569,
May 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202504651,
May 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Complaint #202607682, July 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 25-29 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202504569, May 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 40-44 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Male, 40-44 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202504651, May 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Black Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.