Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $10,001 total settlements.
Davis, Lastarr vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV03511,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 26, 2025, ended March 31, 2026
$10,001 Settlement
Webster, Joyce vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 525383/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 1, 2024
Complaint
Description: In the early afternoon on September 19, 2021, the Plaintiff, a 61-year-old woman who is an active and well-known member of her community, called 311 to request that water services be restored to her building. The water had been turned off as a result of the tenants' long-standing battle with an abusive landlord. At approximately 11:00 a.m., two NYPD members arrived at the plaintiff's residence, placed her in handcuffs and arrested her without explanation. The officers took her to the 77th Precinct where she was told that her landlord told 911 that the plaintiff threatened to have her boyfriend shoot him. The plaintiff didn't have a boyfriend and never made any such comment to the landlord. She explained that he...
Jenkins, Dora vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 519307/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, July 5, 2023
Complaint
Description: On June 14 2021, NYPD Officers Douglas Carr, John Cascone, and John or Jane Does unlawfully attended at the Plaintiff's residence in plain clothes while the Plaintiff was lawfully inside her residence. They knocked forcefully on the door and failed to announce their presence as POs. The Plaintiff asked questions about their presence which were ignored and demanded she come with them. After the Plaintiff further questioned the POs, Carr illegally and forcefully grabbed the Plaintiff and searched her undergarments in a forceful manner touching her intimate areas. He shoved his hands into her undergarments and grabbed and fondled her genitalia. Carr proceeded to accuse the Plaintiff of a criminal offense before vi...