Kevin H. Gleason

Kevin H. Gleason

Kevin H. Gleason
Badge #4430, White Male
Police Officer at Midtown North Precinct since May 2012
Service started July 2010, made $161,000 last year, Tax #949037

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202411726, October 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished)
additional details

Complaint #202006771, October 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202411726, October 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force White Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 30-34 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished)
additional details
Complaint #202006771, October 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 30-34 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Conrad, Garry J. vs City of New York
Case # 154550/2017, Supreme Court - New York, July 19, 2017, ended February 27, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On May 18, 2016, Eric Conrad allegedly had a verbal disagreement with an employee at Food Emporium on West 49th Street and Eighth Avenue in Manhattan. An off-duty, plain-clothed unnamed NYPD officer grabbed Mr. Conrad and escorted him out of the Food Emporium where defendant unnamed NYPD officers and sergeants arrived at the scene. An officer tackled Mr. Conrad to the ground, fracturing his jaw and causing contusions and lacerations to Mr. Conrad's face. Mr. Conrad was restrained on the ground and attempted to lift himself up from the ground and release himself from the grip of the officer. Mr. Conrad was then shot nine times. The manner of death was deemed a "homicide (shot by police)." The autopsy indicated t...