Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case Details:
-
Body-worn camera violation.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Ratliff, Tyson vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 151489/2023,
Supreme Court - New York, February 14, 2023
Complaint
Description: On October 19, 2021 at approximately 1:30 p.m., Plaintiff Tyson Ratliff was lawfully present in the vicinity of 8th Avenue and West 31st Street, New York, NY. Plaintiff was illegally approached, stopped and asked him for his name and identity, without probable cause, reasonable suspicion, valid search or arrest warrant, or any legal justification whatsoever by Defendant Officer Katherine Sepulveda and defendant officers John and Jane Doe 1-10. Plaintiff then politely inquired as to why Defendants had approached and stopped him as he had not committed any criminal offense. Defendants then lied and told Plaintiff that he had an open warrant out for his arrest when Plaintiff did not and then told Plaintiff to wal...