Bart Glowa

Badge #25394, White Male
Police Officer at 105th Precinct since February 2020
Service started January 2017, made $155,000 last year, Tax #963047

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-18159
Closed: 11/1/2017
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202400200, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202312108, May 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202304830, May 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: American Indian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: American Indian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: American Indian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202202558, April 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Asian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202200737, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202400200, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202312108, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202304830, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action American Indian Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word American Indian Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation American Indian Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202202558, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Asian Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202200737, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-18159
Closed: 11/1/2017
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: After being involved in an off-duty incident, did fail and neglect to notify the operations unit
Penalty: Vacation days (7 days)

Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to damage property.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Mendez, Erick vs City of New York
Case # 027362/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 21, 2020
Complaint
Description: On June 30, 2019, the plaintiff was present at Devoe Park, Bronx, when the defendant POs including Eric Dipaolo and Ryan Lawrence were arresting another individual in Devoe Park. When the plaintiff attempted to film the POs arrest with improper force of the other individual, the defendants struck the plaintiff in the head/face area causing the plaintiff to fall to the ground. The plaintiff was then arrested and transported to the 52nd Precinct and then to the Bronx Central Booking. All charges were later dismissed.

Other Documents