Luis Ramirez

Badge #2154, Hispanic Male
Former Detective Grade 2 at 24th Precinct Detective Squad
Service started January 1982, ended February 2012, Tax #878447

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched

Complaints

9 Complaints
17 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Complainant Unavailable
8 Complainant Uncooperative
7 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200716719, November 2007
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #9902273, May 1999
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Hispanic
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9202068, July 1992
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9101763, July 1991
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #9002916, October 1990
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8702079, May 1987
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
additional details

Complaint #8406010, November 1984
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #8403869, August 1984
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #8400212, January 1984
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200716719, November 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #9902273, May 1999
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Hispanic Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9202068, July 1992
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9101763, July 1991
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #9002916, October 1990
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8702079, May 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Substantiated (Command Discipline)
additional details
Complaint #8406010, November 1984
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #8403869, August 1984
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #8400212, January 1984
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Wiggins, Reginald vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 152665/2019, Supreme Court - New York, March 22, 2019
Complaint
Description: On May 28, 2008, plaintiff was at his home located at 123 West 112th Street, Apt. 4W, New York, New York. Defendant NYPD officers came to the plaintiff's home and searched it but recovered nothing during the search. The defendants then arrested the plaintiff in relation to a shooting that occurred recently at the time. Although no evidence from witnesses pointed towards the plaintiff he was still prosecuted and as a result remained incarcerated for almost 9 years. On February 15, 2018, all the charges against the plaintiff were dismissed.