Gabriel D. Pamphile

Gabriel D. Pamphile

Gabriel D. Pamphile
Badge #4331, Black Male
Police Officer at 76th Precinct since April 2022
Service started October 2021, made $86,900 last year, Tax #972847

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons

Complaints

2 Complaints
7 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202602242, February 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202309018, September 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 23, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202602242, February 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202309018, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Black Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 23, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.