Melissa L. Espinal

Melissa L. Espinal

Melissa L. Espinal
Badge #17591, Hispanic Female
Police Officer at Medical Division since February 2024
Also served at Warrant Section, 83rd Precinct
Service started July 2015, made $142,000 last year, Tax #958557

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises (3)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises (2)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property

Complaints

2 Complaints
12 Allegations
8 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
5 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202201365, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 13, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202008073, December 2020
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202201365, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Black Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 13, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202008073, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 40-44 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Short, Derrick vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 530952/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, February 15, 2024
Complaint
Description: On October 24, 2020, plaintiff was lawfully present at 480 Knickerbocker Ave, Brooklyn, NY when defendants approached, grabbed and shot plaintiff three times with TASER guns, punched plaintiff’s body several times, handcuffed plaintiff in an unreasonably tight manner, and twisted plaintiff’s body in a manner that was intended to cause plaintiff pain throughout his body. Defendants knocked out one of plaintiff’s teeth, caused plaintiff to bleed profusely, left scars on plaintiff’s chest, stomach, and both upper thighs, and left scars on plaintiff’s wrists. Plaintiff was transported to Woodhull Hospital via ambulance in handcuffs and leg shackles to have his injuries treated.

Walker, Juan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 507573/2017, Supreme Court - Kings, April 21, 2017
Complaint
Description: On April 21, 2016, Plaintiff Juan Walker was involved in a motor vehicle accident with a vehicle operated by defendant Andrea M. Anastasio, in which defendant A. O. Ioukliaevskikh. The defendants called the police and presented them with false statements, leading defendant Officer Melissa L. Espinal and other NYPD officers to handcuff, arrest, detain and falsely prosecute Walker. Officer Espnial transported Walker to the local precinct where he was placed in a holding cell, subjected to harassment, and eventually charged with disorderly conduct by obstructing vehicular traffic and released.