Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2017-17765
Closed: 9/21/2017
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while having a .24 per centum or more by weight of alcohol in her blood.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while her ability was impaired by the consumption of alcohol.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant with a child who was less than fifteen years of age and a passenger in said vehicle.
-
Guilty:
Failed and neglected to properly safeguard her firearm.
-
Guilty:
Did consume an intoxicant to the extent that said detective was unfit for duty.
-
Guilty:
Did consume an intoxicant to the extent that said detective was unfit for duty while armed.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully refused to submit to a chemical breath test to determine her blood alcohol concentration.
-
Guilty:
Endangered the welfare of a child under the age of seventeen, by driving while intoxicated with her son in the vehicle.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully possessed an open container of alcohol while operating her vehicle on a public highway.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (32 days), suspended w/o pay (13 days), vacation days (35 days)
Wiltshire, James V. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 100786/2015,
Supreme Court - New York, August 28, 2015, ended January 6, 2017
Zero Disposition