Raquel Warburton

Badge #27754, White Female
Police Officer at Queens Court Section since July 2023, active
Also served at 6th Precinct
Service started January 2006, made $103,000 last year, Tax #941167

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17765
Closed: 9/21/2017

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
4 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200713015, September 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: American Indian Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200715851, August 2007
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200713015, September 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Hispanic Female, 26 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question Hispanic Female, 26 Exonerated
Force: Physical force American Indian Male, 23 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200715851, August 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Male, 35 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17765
Closed: 9/21/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while having a .24 per centum or more by weight of alcohol in her blood.
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while her ability was impaired by the consumption of alcohol.
  3. Guilty: Wrongfully operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant with a child who was less than fifteen years of age and a passenger in said vehicle.
  4. Guilty: Failed and neglected to properly safeguard her firearm.
  5. Guilty: Did consume an intoxicant to the extent that said detective was unfit for duty.
  6. Guilty: Did consume an intoxicant to the extent that said detective was unfit for duty while armed.
  7. Guilty: Wrongfully refused to submit to a chemical breath test to determine her blood alcohol concentration.
  8. Guilty: Endangered the welfare of a child under the age of seventeen, by driving while intoxicated with her son in the vehicle.
  9. Guilty: Wrongfully possessed an open container of alcohol while operating her vehicle on a public highway.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (32 days), suspended w/o pay (13 days), vacation days (35 days)


Lawsuits

Wiltshire, James V. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 100786/2015, Supreme Court - New York, August 28, 2015, ended January 6, 2017
Zero Disposition