Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $25,000 total settlements.
Caesar, Lloyd vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV06433,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 3, 2024
Complaint
Description: On October 6, 2022, plaintiff was arrested on the northeast corner of Hegeman Street and Osborne Street in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn. Defendant NYPD officers Blot and Turner initially informed plaintiff he was involved in an assault. Defendant Blot claimed plaintiff had been driving recklessly and harassing the another individual. After being taken to the 73rd precinct, plaintiff was aggressively slammed against the gate during processing, injuring his wrist. On June 15, 2023, defendant NYPD officers Diaz, Perez and Myrthil conducted a stop and frisk of plaintiff without any reasonable suspicion at the corner of New Lots Avenue and Watkins Street in Brownsville, Brooklyn. During these events defendan...
Gravesande, Simeon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 508119/2020,
Supreme Court - Kings, September 22, 2020
Complaint
Description: On April 26, 2018 at approximately 12:00 p.m. in an apartment at 92 Tapscott Street Plaintiff was visiting his aunt when Det. Peter Morales and POs Jane and John Does 1-8 unlawfully entered and searched the apartment. Plaintiff was arrested for possession of a firearm in relation to a filmed incident. The video, which POs possessed, showed the male with the firearm who did not resemble Plaintiff, including that the male lacked specific tattoos the Plaintiff has. No firearm was recovered on or near Plaintiff, he had no knowledge of the firearms incident, and no witness identified Plaintiff as the perpetrator. Plaintiff was incarcerated for approximately 6 days and was terminated from his job as a result. A jury ...
Harper, Etson vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 501655/2012,
Supreme Court - Kings, July 2, 2012, ended February 2, 2017
$25,000 Settlement