Arthur C. Leahy

Arthur C. Leahy

Arthur C. Leahy
Badge #1783, White Male, 55
Detective Grade 1 at Warrant Section since April 2010, active
Service started January 2006, made $189,000 last year, Tax #940367

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202106239, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201701245, February 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
Complainant: Female, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201310699, November 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202106239, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Female, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201701245, February 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Female, 51 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201310699, November 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 42 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 42 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Harper, June vs Detective Leahy, Arthur, et al.
Case # 16CV04178, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 8, 2016, ended June 1, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: The plaintiff was inside her apartment getting her children ready for school when the defendant officers knocked on her door asking for her son who the officers had an outstanding warrant for. The plaintiff told the officers that her son wasn't home, which he wasn't, and the officers then forced their way into the home, assaulted the plaintiff and arrested her. The plaintiff was brought to the hospital for the injuries she sustained and then was taken to the nearby precinct. Due to the defendant officers' fabricated story she was charged with assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and resisting arrest. The charges were later dismi...