Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2010-3335
Opened: 12/21/2010
Closed: 4/2/2015
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Officer was discourteous to a Supervisor by using profanity toward said Supervisor
-
Guilty:
Officer was discourteous to a Supervisor by threatening to file an equal employment opportunity complaint against the Supervisor for checking on her while on post
-
Guilty:
Officer made a disparaging remark about her Supervisor to another Member of Service
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Officer wrongfully divulged/discussed a confidential investigation with another uniformed Member of Service
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty-one (31) pre-suspension days, forfeiture of fifteen (15) vacation days.
Case: 2012-7409
Opened: 5/10/2012
Closed: 4/2/2015
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Officer was discourteous to a Supervisor by using profanity and pointing her finger in his face
-
Guilty:
After being instructed by a Supervisor to standby, officer failed and neglected to comply with said order
Penalty: See 2010-3335