Pedro J. Herrera

Badge #5346, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 47th Precinct since February 2017
Service started January 2016, made $172,000 last year, Tax #960667

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search (2)

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 8/15/2024
Case: 2 Allegations
Closed: 7/11/2024
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 SRAD Closure
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202511594, November 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202510837, October 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202509200, August 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202402679, March 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202301358, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202301290, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 21, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202511594, November 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202510837, October 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202509200, August 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202402679, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 15-17 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202301358, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202301290, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Female, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 21, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 8/15/2024
Case Details:
  1. Bias-based policing.
  2. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Closed: 7/11/2024
Case Details:
  1. Body-worn camera violation.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Roundtree, My'asha vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 811870/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 22, 2021
Complaint
Description: On May 26, 2020, Plaintiff My'Asha Roundtree's apartment was entered by Defendant NYPD Police Officers without a warrant seeking to arrest Plaintiff over allegations of misdemeanor assault. Plaintiff arranged to turn herself in two days later at the 47th Precinct. While in a holding cell, plaintiff was denied a change, food and water, and the ability to make a call to her attorney by Lanay Reyes, Winghong Lau, Rosibel Kery, First Name Unknown Nunez, and First Name Unknown Herena. Plaintiff was also thrown headfirst into the NYPD transport van. Plaintiff brings claims of: assault and battery, negligent hiring, retention, training and supervision, failure to intervene, respondeat superior, excessive force, delib...

Other Documents