Saul N. Rodriguezcarrasco

Badge #14456, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at 34th Precinct
Service started April 2019, ended June 2024, Tax #967667

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27323
Closed: 1/23/2023

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Unavailable

Complaint #202401999, February 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202103998, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202401999, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Male Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202103998, July 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27323
Closed: 1/23/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Delorbes, Victor, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 150145/2024, Supreme Court - New York, April 25, 2024
Complaint
Description: On January 4, 2021, the plaintiffs were falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted because the defendant NYPD officers were retaliating against the plaintiff for dating the ex-girlfriend of the officer's colleague. Specifically, the defendants fabricated allegations against the plaintiffs that they damaged the glass the front door to a Chase Bank a few blocks away. There is no evidence that the plaintiff and his friends went anywhere near the Chase Bank the day they were accused. After frisking the individuals, the officers did not recover any illegal drugs, weapons, or contraband. The plaintiffs were falsely arrested without probable cause or legal justification, and also provided the District Attorney with m...