Nicholas E. Mckeever

Nicholas E. Mckeever

Nicholas E. Mckeever
Badge #25164, White Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau Anti-Terrorism Unit since May 2018, active
Service started July 2011, made $154,000 last year, Tax #950867

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26191
Closed: 12/1/2022

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded

Complaint #202105115, August 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202003167, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, August 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202105115, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202003167, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 60-64 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Hispanic Male, 60-64 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 60-64 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 60-64 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, August 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26191
Closed: 12/1/2022
Case Details:
  1. Made misleading or inaccurate statements during a civilian complaint review board interview.
  2. Wrongfully used physical force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Lurch, Robert Derek Jr. vs John Doe Police Officer Badge Number 8520, et al.
Case # 23CV06704, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 25, 2023

Clancy, Destiny, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 151129/2022, Supreme Court - New York, February 17, 2022

Other Documents