Matthew B. Mcgrath

Matthew B. Mcgrath

Matthew B. Mcgrath
Badge #23245, White Male
Police Officer at Midtown North Precinct since May 2021
Service started November 2020, made $86,900 last year, Tax #969967

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29980
Closed: 5/16/2024

View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
8 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202207665, November 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202207665, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 40-44 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29980
Closed: 5/16/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully deactivated their body-worn camera.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B