Dinercy Pinales

Badge #4177, Hispanic Female
Sergeant at Housing Manhattan since March 2026
Also served at 47th Precinct, 46th Precinct
Service started July 2015, made $145,000 last year, Tax #959077

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Lawsuit Settlements:
$62,500   Clarke, Casey vs Po Baez, Stanley, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 033752/2018E
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 SRAD Closure
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202504601, May 2025
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202504058, April 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202503493, April 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #201708658, October 2017
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202504601, May 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202504058, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202503493, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details
Complaint #201708658, October 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 41 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Clarke, Casey vs Po Baez, Stanley, et al.
Case # 033752/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 4, 2019, ended March 23, 2020
$62,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 14, 2017, the plaintiff was unlawfully stopped, seized, searched, assaulted and arrested by the defendant PO including POs Stanley Baez, Melvin Moultrie and Dinercy Pinales without any reasonable suspicion of unlawful behaviour. The defendants falsely accused the plaintiff of crimes and illegally searched the plaintiff. The plaintiff was thrown down to the ground and then tased him causing the plaintiff serious physical harm. The plaintiff was then taken to the 47th Precinct where the plaintiff was fingerprinted, photographed, strip-searched and detained. The charges were dismissed on January 31, 2018.

Other Documents