Crisbel Lopez

Crisbel Lopez

Crisbel Lopez
Badge #7588, Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 43rd Precinct since March 2021
Service started January 2020, made $83,100 last year, Tax #969177

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Other
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Other

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28688
Closed: 10/25/2023

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
16 Allegations
8 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 OMB PEG Directive Closure
3 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded

Complaint #202311557, December 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202307203, July 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202202357, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, October 5, 2023
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202311557, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Age 40-44 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Age 40-44 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202307203, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 18-20 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Female, 18-20 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Gun Pointed Female, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202202357, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Age 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Age 30-34 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Race Age 30-34 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action Age 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Age 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Age 30-34 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Age 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Age 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Other Age 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Age 30-34 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, October 5, 2023
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28688
Closed: 10/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Interfere with a recording device.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully used offensive language.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications