Michael J. Ippolito

Michael J. Ippolito

Michael J. Ippolito
Badge #9212, White Male
Police Officer at Paid Detail Unit since March 2026
Also served at 111th Precinct
Service started April 2017, made $148,000 last year, Tax #963577

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24125
Closed: 11/21/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000   Alsaeidi, Montaser, et al. vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 QCSC QCSC 716291/2022
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202309589, September 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202103376, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202102396, April 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202309589, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 15-17 Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Word Male, 15-17 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202103376, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Female, 45-49 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202102396, April 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 65-69 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 65-69 Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24125
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - refused to provide name
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.

Alsaeidi, Montaser, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 716291/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, August 30, 2022, ended February 22, 2024
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 29, 2020, Plaintiffs entered into a partnership agreement for ownership of Jam Juice Vape Shop. On May 17, 2021, Plaintiffs had a business dispute with their partners, and the partners changed the locks to prevent Plaintiffs from entering. Plaintiffs went to the NYPD and met with NYPD Sergeant Jaspreet Gill who told the Plaintiffs that the dispute was civil and NYPD would not intervene, and advised them that they could call a locksmith to have the store's locks changed back. Plaintiffs returned to the store, causing their business partners to call the police. NYPD responded and determined Plaintiffs were lawful co-owners and there was nothing unlawful about their presence there. NYPD facilitated Plainti...

Tsekenis-Shehas, Anna vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 722924/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, October 18, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about June 6, 2021. at approximately 1:25 PM, at the residence of Plaintiff at 214004 86th Ave, after Plaintiff had requested assistance regarding a domestic dispute via 911, NYPD Officers Creighton, Ippoloti, Felipe, Portalatin and John or Jane Does 1-10 unjustifiably arrested Plaintiff without probable cause. In doing so, they engaged in excessive force and refused to loosen the handcuffs when she complained of excessive tightness. She was detained until June 7, 2021 at or about 4 PM at the 111th Precinct at which time she was released without being charged.

Other Documents